HALICIOGLU, F. (2003) “Testing Wagner’s Law for Turkey, 1960-2000”,

Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, Vol.1, No. 2, pp.129-141.

http://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwppe/0502013.html

 

 

Cited by

 

 

1.  Gromling, M.  (2005) “Ways to Interpret Turkey’s Current Account”,

Intereconomics, Vol.40, No. 4, pp.217-225.

www.springerlink.com/index/VQ07447H42HR8062.pdf 

 

2.  Arisoy, I. (2005) “Wagner ve Keynes hipotezleri cercevesinde Turkiye’de kamu harcamalari ve ekonomik buyume iliskisi”,

Cukurova Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Vol.14, No.2, pp.63-80.

http://sosyalbilimler.cu.edu.tr/dergi.asp?dosya=232

 

3. Arisoy, I. (2005) “Turkiye’de kamu harcamalari ve ekonomik buyume iliskisi (1950-2203)”, 

Discussion Papers, No.15, Turkish Economics Association, Ankara

www.tek.org.tr/dosyalar/ARISOY-05.pdf 

 

4. Goker, I. (2005), STOCKHOLMS UNIVERSITET  Nationalekonomiska institutionen

Magisteruppsats, 10 poäng  VT 2005

http://www.ne.su.se/education/grundutbild/cd/vt05/d/uppsatser/05_goker.pdf

 

5. Gromling, M. (2005) “Die auβenwirtschaflichen Verflechtungender Turkei”,

Journal for Studies on Turkey, Vol. 18, Nos 1-2, pp.127-152. http://www.zft-online.de

 

6. Cavusoglu, A. T. (2005) “Testing the validity of Wagner’s law in Turkey: the bounds testing approach”,

The Review of Political Sciences of Ankara University, Vol. 60, No.1, pp.73-78.

http://www.politics.ankara.edu.tr/dergi/pdf/60/1/4_a_tarkan_cavusoglu.pdf

 

7. Junior, J. O. C. (2006) “Efeitos do investmento publico sobre o produto e a produtiradade: uma analise emprica”,

Texto Para Discussa, No.1204, Brazil.

 www.ipea.gov.br/pub/td/2006/td_1204.pdf 

 

8. Magableh, M. A. (2006) A theoretical and empirical analysis of the Wagner hypothesis.

PhD Thesis in Economics, School of Economics and Finance, University of Western Sydney.

http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/29920

 

9.  Narayan, P.K.,  Nielsen, I., Smyth, R.  (2006) “Panel data, cointegration, causality, and Wagner’s law:

empirical evidence from Chinese provinces”, Discussion Papers, No. 01/06, Department of Economics, Monash University.

 http://www.buseco.monash.edu/eco/research/papers/2006/0106Wagner'sLaw.pdf

 

10. Aregbeyen, O. (2006) “Cointegration, causality, and Wagner’s law: a test for Nigeria”,

Economic and Financial Review, Vol.44, No.2, pp.1-17.

http://www.cenbank.org/OUT/PUBLICATIONS/EFR/RD/2007/CBN%20ECONOMIC%20AND%20FINANCIAL%20REVIEW%20OF%20JUNE%202006.PDF

 

11. Aysan, M.F. (2006) “Increasing role of municipalities in social policy in Turkey: the case of Istanbul metropolitan municipality in the last decade”,

MA Thesis in International Relations, University of Marmara, Turkey.

http://www.belgeler.com/blg/14yx/increasing-role-of-municipalities-in-social-policy-in-turkey-the-case-of-istanbul-metropolitan-municipality-in-the-last-decade-turkiye-de-belediyelerin-sosyal-politikadaki-artan-rolu-son-on-yilda-istanbul-buyuksehir-belediyesi-ornegi

 

12.  Guerrero, F. and Parker, E. (2007) “The effects of federal government size on long-term economic growth in the United States, 1792-2004”,

UNR Economics Working Paper Series, No: 07-002, University of Nevada.

http://www.coba.unr.edu/econ/wp/papers/UNRECONWP07002.pdf

 

13. Mohammadi, H.,  Cak, H.,  and Cak, D. (2008) “Wagner's hypothesis: new evidence from Turkey using the bounds testing approach”,

 Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 35, No.1, pp.94-106.

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/01443580810844442

 

14. Narayan, P.K.,  Nielsen, I., Smyth, R.  (2008) “Panel data, cointegration, causality, and Wagner’s law:

empirical evidence from Chinese provinces”, China Economic Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp.297-307.

DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2006.11.004  

 

15. Oswaldo, J. (2008) “Politica fiscal e impacts productivos dos gastos publicos”,

PhD Thesis in Economics, Graduate School of Economics at Fundacao Getulio Vargas,  Rio de Jenario, Brazil.

http://virtualbib.fgv.br/dspace/bitstream/123456789/2148/1/Tese_Jose_Oswaldo.pdf

 

16.  Erjavec, A. (2008) “Preverjanje veljavnosti Wagnerjevega zakone za  drzare europske unije”,

MSc Thesis in Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Ljunlyani, Slovakia.

http://www.cek.ef.uni-lj.si/u_diplome/erjavec3296.pdf

 

17. Uysal, D. and Mucuk, M. (2009) “Turkiye ekonomisinde kamu harcamalari ve ekonomik buyume iliskisi”,

Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, Vol.46, No.527, pp.39-48.

http://www.ekonomikyorumlar.com.tr/sayi_527.html

 

18. Selen, U. and Eryigit, K. (2009) “Yapisal kirilmalarin varliginda Wagner kanunu Turkiye icin gecerli mi?”,

Maliye Dergisi, No.156, pp.177-198.

http://dergiler.sgb.gov.tr/calismalar/maliye_dergisi/yayinlar/md/156/11.Ufuk.SELEN_Kadir.ERYigiT.pdf

 

19. Gul, E. and Yavuz, H. (2009) “Turkiye’de kamu harcamlari ile ekonomik buyume arasindaki iliskinin ekonometrik bir analizi: 1963-2008”,

Conference Paper, presented at International Davraz Congress on Social and Economic Issues Shaping the World’s Future: New Global Dialogue, 24-26 September 2009, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.

http://idc.sdu.edu.tr/tammetinler/kalkinma/kalkinma1.pdf

 

20. Frimpong, J.M. and Oteng-Abayie, E.F. (2009) “Does the Wagner’s hypothesis matter in developing economies? Evidence from three west African monetary zone (WAMZ) countries”, American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp.141-147. http://www.scipub.org/fulltext/ajeba/ajeba12141-147.pdf

 

21. Bagdiken, M. and Beser, B. (2009) “Ekonomik buyume ile kamu harcamalari arasindaki nedensenlik iliskisinin Wagner tezi kapsaminda bir analizi: Turkiye ornegi”, ZKU Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.5, No.9, pp.1-17.

http://iibf.karaelmas.edu.tr/sbd/makaleler/1303-9245/200905009001017.pdf

 

22. Yay, T. and Tastan, H. (2009) “Growth of public expenditures in Turkey during the 1950-2004 period: an econometric analysis”,

Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, Vol.12, No.4, pp.101-118.

http://www.ipe.ro/rjef/rjef4_09/rjef4_09_6.pdf

 

23. Basari, S., Aksu, H., Temurlenk, M.S., Polat, O. (2009) “Government spending and economic growth relationship in Turkey:

 a bound testing approach”, Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ataturk University, Vol.13, No.1, pp.301-314.

http://e-dergi.atauni.edu.tr/index.php/SBED/article/view/2630

 

24. Omotor, D.G. and Akpobi, O. (2009) “Cointegration and the long-run validity of Wagner’s law: evidence from Nigeria”,

Conference Proceedings, pp. 170-173.

36th Annual Meeting of Northeast Business and Economics Association, 5-7 November 2009, Worcester State School.

https://webstorage.worcester.edu/sites/wobrien/nbea/Shared%20Documents/Archived%202009%20Documents/Final%20NBEA%202009%20Proceedings.pdf

 

25. Andrei, T., Stacu, S., Iacob, I., Herteliu, C., and Oanced, B. (2009) ‘Testing Wagner’s Law for Romania”,

Conference Proceedings in Challenges for Analysis the Economy, the Business and Social Progress (editors: Kovacs, P., Szep, K. and Katona, T. ), International Scientific Conference, Szeged, November 19-21 2009. University Szeged Press, Hungary.

http://www2.eco.u-szeged.hu/conference/abstractbook.pdf

http://www.e-doc.hu/books/konfanyagok/1.Andrei_Stancu_Iacob_Herteliu_Oancea/1.Andrei_Stancu_Iacob_Herteliu_Oancea.pdf

 

26. Cosimo, M. (2009) “Legge di Wagner e spesa pubblica Italiana disaggregate: un approccio VAR”,

Economia Pubblica, Nos:5-6.

DOI: 10.3280/EP2009-005006

 

27. Kirmanoglu, H. (2009) Kamu Ekonomisi Analizi, 2. Baski. Beta, Istanbul.

http://www.idefix.com/kitap/kamu-ekonomisi-analizi-hulya-kirmanoglu/tanim.asp?sid=KLDECWG1VE5E2FOLTSDH

 

28. Yunting, C. (2009) “Expenditure in OECD countries and the causal relationship between economic growth: Wagner validation rule”,

MBA Thesis, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/login?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22097DYU00321019%22.&searchmode=basic

 

29. Durevall, D. and Henrekson, M. (2010) “The futile quest for a grand explanation of long-run government expenditure”,

Working Paper, No: 818, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Sweden.

http://www.ifn.se/web/eng.aspx

http://www.ifn.se/BinaryLoader.axd?OwnerID=1e94b632-c64e-44c7-b4f6-2145f57e9cc9&OwnerType=0&PropertyName=File1&FileName=Wp818.pdf&Attachment=True

 

30. Durevall, D. and Henrekson, M. (2010) “The futile quest for a grand explanation of long-run government expenditure”,

Working Papers in Economics, No: 428, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg.

http://gupea.ub.gu.se/dspace/bitstream/2077/21820/1/gupea_2077_21820_1.pdf

 

31. Andrei, T., Lefter, V., Oancea, B. and Stancu, S. (2010) “A comparative study of some features of higher education in Romania, Bulgaria and Hungary”, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, Vol.13, No.2, pp. 280-294.

http://www.ipe.ro/rjef/rjef2_10/rjef2_10_18.pdf

 

32. Zheng, Y., Li, J., Wang, X., and Li, C. (2010) “An empirical analysis of the validity of Wagner’s law in China: a case study based on Gibbs samples”, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol.5, No.6, pp.161-168.

http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/6272

 

33. Aytac, D. , Guven, M.C. (2010) “Kamu harcamalarinin bilesimi ekonomik buyumeyi etkiler mi? Turkiye ekonomisi icin bir analiz”,

Sosyoekonomi, Vol.6, No.2, pp.129-152.

http://www.sosyoekonomi.hacettepe.edu.tr/100207.pdf

 

34. Cosimo, M. (2010) “Wagner’s law and augmented Wagner’s law in EU-27:

 A time-series analysis on starionarity, cointegration and causality’, C.R.E.I. Working Papers, No. 05.

http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26668/

 

35. Cosimo, M. (2010) “Wagner’s law and Italian disaggregated public spending: some empirical evidences”,

MPRA Papers, No.26662.

http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26662/

 

36. Ighodanu, C. and  Oriakhi, D. (2010) “Does the relationship between government expenditure and economic growth follow Wagner’s law

in Nigeria ?”,

Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, Vol.10, No.2, pp.185-189.

http://www.upet.ro/en/annals/pdf/annals-2010-part2.pdf

http://www.upet.ro/anale/economie/

http://www.upet.ro/anale/economie/pdf/20100217.pdf

 

37. Wu, A.M. and Lin, M. (2010) “Determinants of government size: evidence from China”,

MPRA Papers No. 27089.

http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27089/

 

38. Andrei, T., Teodorescu, D.,  Oancea, B. and Stancu, S. (2010) “Some comments on Wagner law”,

Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, Vol.44, No.1, pp.45-62.

http://www.ecocyb.ase.ro/ABSTRACTS,%201,2010.pdf

 

39. Wu, S.Y., Tang, J.H., Lin, E.S. (2010) “The impact of government expenditure on economic growth:

how sensitive to the level of development?”, Journal of Policy Modelling, Vol.32, No.6, pp.804-817.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.05.011 

 

40. Lenard, M.A. (2010) The political economy of federal assitance:

demand-side determinants of new awards in the 110th congress.

M.A. Thesis in Political Sciences, Georgia State University.

http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=political_science_theses

 

41. Jeong, H. (2010) “Globalization and the politics of the welfare state”, PhD Thesis in Political Science,

Graduate School, University of Kentucky, USA.

http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=gradschool_diss

 

42. Husnain, M.I. and Mehmood, A. (2010) “Whether or not public expenditure in Pakistan follows Wagner’s law? A time-series study 1973-2010”,

Conference Paper, presented at International Conference on Applied Economics, ICOAE 2010, 26-28 August 2010, Athens, Greece.

http://kastoria.teikoz.gr/icoae2/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/0331.pdf

 

43. Yunting, C. (2010) “Expenditure in OECD countries and the causal relationship between economic growth: Wagner validation rule”,

 Bank of Taiwan Quarterly Review, Vol.62, No.2, pp.138-162.

http://www.bot.com.tw/Publications/Quarterly/Documents/62_2/62_2_7.pdf

 

44. Babadunte, M. A. (2011) “A bound testing analysis of Wagner’s law in Nigeria”,

Applied Economics, Vol.43, No.21, pp.2843-2850.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840903425012

 

45. Durevall, D. and Henrekson, M. (2011) “The futile quest for a grand explanation of long-run government expenditure”,

Journal of Public Economics, Vol.95, Nos 7-8, pp.708-712.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.02.004 

 

46. Pradhan, R. P. (2011) “Government spending and economic growth in SAARC: evidence from panel cointegration”,

International Journal of Economics Policy in Emerging Countries, Vol.4, No.1, pp.78-94.

http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&rec_id=38874&prevQuery=&ps=10&m=or

 

47. Husnain, M. I. (2011) “Keynes versus Wagner: aggregated and disagregated analysis of public expenditures in selected Asian countries”,

International  Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue 67, pp.46-53.

 http://www.eurojournals.com/IRJFE_67_04.pdf

 

48. Akpan, U.F. (2011) “Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s hypothesis:

time series evidence for Nigeria, 1970-2008”,

Journal of Economic Research, Vol.16, pp.59-84.

http://jer.hanyang.ac.kr/issue/16_1/1613.pdf

 

49. Pahlavani, M., Abed, D., Pourshabi, F. (2011) “Investigating the Keynesian view and Wagner’s law on the size of government and economic growth in Iran”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol.2, No.13, pp.170-175.

www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol._2_No._13_Special_Issue.../18.pdf

50. Tasseven, O. (2011) “The Wagner’s law: time series evidence for Turkey, 1960-2006”,

Dogus University Journal, Vol.12, No.2, pp.304-316.

http://journal.dogus.edu.tr/index.php/duj/article/view/275/301

 

51. Oktayer, A. (2011) “Turkiye’de ekonomik buyume ve kamu harcamalari arsindaki iliskinin ampirik analizi:1950-2009”,

Iktisat Fakultesi Mecmuasi, Vol.61, No.1, pp.261-282.

http://www.iudergi.com/tr/index.php/iktisatmecmua/article/viewFile/7333/6837

 

52. Gul, E. and Yavuz, H. (2011) “Turkiye’de kamu harcamlari ile ekonomik buyume arasindaki iliskinin ekonometrik bir analizi: 1963-2008”,

Maliye Dergisi, No.160, pp.72-85.

http://212.174.133.188/calismalar/maliye_dergisi/yayinlar/md/160/004.pdf

 

53. Sugimoto, I. (2011) Economic Grrowth of Singapore in the Twentieth Century: Historical GDP Estimates and Empirical Investigations.

World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore.

http://www.worldscibooks.com/economics/7858.html

 

54. Altunc, O.F. (2011) “Kamu harcamalari ve ekonomik buyume iliskisi: Turkiye’ye iliskin ampirik kanitlar”,

Yonetim ve Ekonomi, Vol.18, No.2, pp.145-157.

http://www2.bayar.edu.tr/yonetimekonomi/dergi/pdf/C18S22011/145_157.pdf

 

55. Magazzino, C. (2011) “Disaggregated public spending, GDP and money supply: evidence for Italy”,

Eurpean Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, Issue 41, pp.118-131.

http://www.eurojournals.com/EJEFAS_41_12.pdf

 

56. Carter, A. (2011) “Another look at Wagner’s hypothesis application to Barbados”,

Research and Policy Working Papers, Vol.4, pp.33-45. Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs, Barbados.

www.economicaffairs.gov.bb/download.php?id=265

 

57. Wu, A.M. and Lin, M. (2012) “Determinants of government size: evidence from China”,

Public Choice, Vol.151, No:1-2, pp.255-270.

DOI: 10.1007/s11127-010-9746-y

 

58. Kucukkale, Y., Yamak, R. (2012) “Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s law with disaggregated data:

Evidence from Turkey, 1968-2004”,

MPRA Papers, No:36894.

http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/36894/1/MPRA_paper_36894.pdf